Free & Open-Source DevOps Hub: 100% Valid Docker Compose configs & verified hardware benchmarks Try VPS RAM Calculator →
n8m
n8m.org DevOps
Directory SaaS Alternatives Compare Apps VPS RAM & Cost Estimator Docker Run to Compose
Head-to-Head Technical Benchmark

NocoDB vs Stirling-PDF

Technical hardware and popularity breakdown for self-hosting NocoDB and Stirling-PDF on cloud VPS servers.

Canonical Comparison URL: /compare/nocodb-vs-stirling-pdf
Interactive Tool Matchup

Switch Matchup or Select New Apps

Change Candidate A or Candidate B to compare specs against any open-source tool in the directory.

VS
Candidate A

NocoDB

nocodb/nocodb
★ 47.1k

Open-source Airtable alternative that turns any relational database (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite) into an interactive smart spreadsheet.

Min RAM
1 GB
Lower RAM
CPU Cores
1 vCPU
Disk Storage
15 GB
Deploy NocoDB Docker Compose →
Candidate B

Stirling-PDF

Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF
★ 48.2k

Robust, locally hosted web application to split, merge, convert, OCR, watermark, and sign PDF files without cloud uploads.

Min RAM
1.5 GB
CPU Cores
1 vCPU
Disk Storage
15 GB
Deploy Stirling-PDF Docker Compose →

Full Technical Benchmark Breakdown

Specification NocoDB Stirling-PDF Advantage
Primary Category databases productivity —
Minimum RAM Required 1 GB 1.5 GB NocoDB (0.5 GB lighter)
GitHub Stars ★ 47,100 ★ 48,200 Stirling-PDF (+1,100 stars)
GitHub Forks 3,200 3,900 Stirling-PDF
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0 Open-Source
Primary Language TypeScript Java —
Docker Image nocodb/nocodb:latest frooodle/s-pdf:latest Both Container Ready
Multi-App Server Sizing

Can You Run Both NocoDB & Stirling-PDF Together?

Yes! Running both simultaneously requires approximately 4 GB RAM including host OS and Docker daemon buffers. A single standard $6-$10/mo cloud VPS easily hosts both without bottlenecks.

Open VPS RAM Calculator Deploy 4GB VPS ($6.99/mo) →